Toyota Airbag Defect Analysis Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Toyota Airbag Defect Analysis - Essay Example This latter phase comes on the backdrop of failures in denials. As a result, the firm takes to apology, compensation and repentance to retain client loyalty (Cornelissen and Erving, 2006). In this analysis, the various communication strategies used by the firm, in relation to the case under review, are looked into. Like other firms, it is often quite difficult to accept various claims that could negatively impact on the sustainability of the business operations of the firm under specific scenarios. In fact, some claims can easily be used by competitor firms to derail business operations of the rival firm. In this case, the denial strategy employed by the Toyota firm in refuting claims of defects in its systems clearly comes out (Toyota, 2014). This denial comes on the back of an analysis by the Safety Research Strategies Inc. (2014), which has successfully linked the systemic defects to 4 fatalities and 139 injuries. The various reasons behind such denials are further analyzed. Following denials and persistent occurrences of the same problem with the systems, firms often come back to give clarifications to their clients in a bid to maintain their loyalty and confidence in the firm’s services (Toyota, 2013). This low level of responsibility is seen in attempts by Toyota to clarify the nature of the defect, and the various models affected in their press release; dated April 11th, 2013. At this stage, the firm offers to recall and rectify the problem. At a higher level of responsibility, the firm, notably in its June 11th 2014 press release, further looks into freely replacing all affected airbags, and ensuring that such defects are not seen again. This final move is seen as a rectification strategy (Toyota, 2014). Through critical analysis, several economic and corporate theories are found to be applicable to the Toyota case. Notably, the positive accounting theory is applicable in

Persuasive Arguments For Gay Marriage Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Persuasive Arguments For Gay Marriage - Essay Example Gay marriages rights should be enforced considering gay people are born gay, they adopt children who would have been in problems despite their failure to procreate failing to prolong the human race. Gay marriages should be legalized considering that every citizen in America has the liberty of choice and ones choices should not be curtailed because of the long-held traditions. This is because homosexuals are same as heterosexual people only that they possess gay genes as recently found by medical researchers (LeVay). Therefore, it is not gays or lesbians choice to be so, it is only that they are naturally gays and we should respect them as they are as part of our society. In this case, considering these people do not choose to be in gay marriages but nature has forced them to be in them we should respect their gay marriage choices. Furthermore, we should not rationalize that since heterosexuals are the majority then marriage involving a man and a woman are the best. Moreover, considering the great number of orphans and poor families who are not in a position to provide effectively for their children, and most of them ending up as criminals, malnourished and others die off. Even though people should practice family planning and at the same time raise children, they can afford, our society would be much better off currently if they legalized gay marriages. This is because gay marriages do not procreate and consequently adopt children in order to form a family (Cline). Therefore, through adopting children they will have played a key role in alleviating the woes of these children, poor families and our great nation at large. In addition, this will also reduce crime rates in our country since most of the children once they lack a means of generating income for their sustenance result to crimes as a means of getting their daily bread.